Main

BTU researchers calculate that annual inflation exceeded 5% in five of Georgia’s six price-observation cities in October 2026, with a 3.49 percentage-point gap between the highest and lowest rates. Price pressure is geographically widespread, but its effect on household budgets and local demand depends on which expenses are changing.

Key Takeaways

• BTU’s calculation from Geostat’s city indices puts October 2026 annual inflation at 6.39% in Tbilisi and 2.90% in Telavi. The 3.49-point range compares rates of price growth, not differences in how expensive the cities are.
• In October 2026, transport prices rose by 18.31–24.99% year on year across all six observed Georgian cities, while the broad housing and utilities group increased by 9.39–12.71%. These shared pressures also affected cities with lower headline inflation.
• BTU researchers assess that Georgian households and businesses should read city inflation alongside relevant spending categories. A lower education price index does not automatically reduce the bills of a household that does not purchase the affected service.

Georgia’s annual inflation rate of 5.9% matters to consumers and to companies planning next year’s wages, prices and sales. Behind the national figure, however, cities present different pictures. Geostat’s November 3 release and detailed tables show that October’s price growth was not confined to one large market. Annual inflation exceeded 5% in five of the six observation cities. Telavi stood apart, yet several essential expense categories increased at double-digit rates there too. [1–3]

BTU’s principal finding brings these facts together: price growth is geographically broad, while lower headline inflation does not imply relief across every expense. This distinction has practical consequences. A business may infer one demand outlook from the national number while its local customers experience a different combination of food, housing and healthcare costs. Breaking the headline into cities and categories makes those differences visible without inventing a representative household’s actual bill.

Five cities above 5 percent

Annual inflation in October was 6.39% in Tbilisi, 6.36% in Batumi, 5.41% in Zugdidi, 5.36% in Kutaisi, 5.32% in Gori and 2.90% in Telavi. BTU researchers calculate a difference of 3.4853 percentage points between the highest and lowest unrounded rates, or 3.49 points after rounding. A percentage point is the difference between two percentage rates. The result therefore does not mean that Tbilisi is 3.49% more expensive than Telavi. [2]

Inflation by city

October 2026. Annual: against October 2025; monthly: against September 2026. Source: Geostat; index-to-rate conversion and rounding by BTU. [2–3]

The annual rates in Tbilisi and Batumi are very close: both round to 6.4% at one decimal place. Building a strong ranking around that narrow difference would add little. The more useful contrast is between most of the observed cities and Telavi, followed by a closer look at which expenses move differently. The monthly column also separates two time horizons. October’s change from September is distinct from the annual rate and should not be added to it.

Nor does “five out of six” describe five-sixths of the population. It counts the cities in the official price-observation system, not the people affected. Geostat collects prices in Tbilisi, Kutaisi, Batumi, Gori, Telavi and Zugdidi. Their indices do not separately describe every settlement in the surrounding regions. They help establish the geographical pattern of price growth but cannot supply an individual inflation rate for a rural household or another municipality. [4–5]

Shared pressures and different local bills

There is a common element across the cities. Transport prices increased sharply everywhere, ranging from 18.31% year on year in Kutaisi to 24.99% in Batumi. The group covering housing, water, electricity, gas and other fuels rose by 9.39–12.71% across the six cities. Transport includes vehicle purchases and transport services as well as fuel. Likewise, the housing group is much broader than rent alone. [1–2]

Alongside this common pressure, local differences are substantial. Food and non-alcoholic beverages increased by 5.01% in Batumi, 2.69% in Tbilisi and just 0.15% in Telavi. Healthcare prices rose by 9.41% in Tbilisi and 4.84% in Batumi. Even cities with almost identical headline rates can therefore have different expenses exerting greater pressure. These are average changes within product and service groups, not identical increases in every shop or clinic.

Four expense groups moving differently

Annual change %, October 2026 against October 2025. The housing group includes water, electricity, gas and other fuels. Values are category price changes, not contributions to total inflation. Source: Geostat; conversion and rounding by BTU. [2]

The comparison separates a category’s rate of price growth from its contribution to total inflation. A higher percentage increase does not necessarily mean a larger contribution: the category’s weight in the basket matters too. This article compares city category rates. It does not convert them into exact contributions or a numerical allocation of the causes of the headline gap between cities. That would require the appropriate weights and comparable base indices to be calculated in full. [4]

What Telavi’s lower headline reveals

Telavi’s 2.90% annual rate illustrates why the headline needs its components. Transport rose by 22.17%, housing and utilities by 10.73%, and healthcare by 7.68%. At the same time, the overall food and non-alcoholic beverage price level was almost unchanged, while the education group index fell by 40.29%. These movements coexist within the same city. [2]

Education also deserves attention nationally. Geostat reports a 12.0% annual decline for the broad education group and a 32.9% fall for its higher-education subcategory. Meanwhile, preschool and primary education prices increased by 8.8%, and secondary education by 6.6%. A decline in the aggregate therefore does not mean that tuition became cheaper for every student or age group. The national higher-education figure and Telavi’s broad education-group figure also have different coverage and must not be treated as equivalent. [1]

This is a meaningful distributional issue. A household that never paid for the affected educational service cannot receive that price reduction in its own budget. Transport and medical costs may be its principal changes even when citywide inflation is relatively low. Another household may obtain substantial relief from an actual fall in tuition. This is an economic interpretation, not a measurement of benefits received by families. Establishing those benefits requires information about their actual expenditure and service use.

What a city price index measures

Geostat’s 2026 basket contains 305 goods and services and is identical across the six cities. It reflects the average consumer’s spending structure; individual households do not buy every item in the same proportions. Prices are registered monthly at retail and service outlets. The national index is not a simple average of the six cities: the methodology combines city results using weights corresponding to regional expenditure patterns. [4–5]

Lower inflation must therefore be distinguished from lower prices. A city’s annual index compares its current prices with its own prices a year earlier. Two cities may have different starting price levels, which their growth percentages cannot reveal. Comparing how expensive they are would require actual prices for comparable products and services, equivalent housing conditions and an appropriate spending basket. October’s inflation table does not provide that ranking.

The same care applies to wages and purchasing power. City price growth alone cannot establish how much a household’s circumstances improved or deteriorated. Income changes, household composition and spending patterns also matter. City and category indices nevertheless provide a better starting question: which increases must a particular income absorb? That is more informative than applying the national percentage uniformly to every person.

What businesses can learn

For a local company, inflation concerns both costs and demand. If customers spend more on essential transport, housing and healthcare, the money left for other purchases will also depend on their incomes. Clothing shops, cafés, repair services and other businesses may be affected differently by that possible reallocation. The official index does not measure a particular company’s sales, but it identifies areas where pressure on customers’ budgets may intensify.

The national 5.9% is consequently neither an automatic justification for raising every selling price nor an exact measure of every employee’s living costs. A company needs its own purchasing, rent, service and wage data. City statistics add context to that assessment. It is particularly important to distinguish higher cash revenue from a larger volume of goods sold: turnover can rise because prices are higher even when customers buy no more than before.

For businesses with several branches, city differences are especially relevant. A national average may be too broad when assessing demand for the same offer in different places. Different food-price increases, for instance, may affect customers’ discretionary budgets differently. Yet the table alone cannot explain falling sales: product quality, competition, income and seasonality also matter. The data sharpen the question rather than automatically answer it.

Reading the national picture locally

October’s central lesson is straightforward: price growth is not only a Tbilisi story, and a lower headline does not imply stability across all essential expenses. BTU’s comparison demonstrates that through the city count, the 3.49-point range and the different composition of spending pressures. Households need to consider the services they actually use; businesses need to consider their own costs and customers. National inflation provides the overall direction, while city and category detail explain what that direction can mean in practice.

Questions and answers

Does Telavi’s 2.90 percent mean it is the cheapest city?

No. It measures the annual change in Telavi’s prices. Ranking price levels or living costs across cities requires a different comparison.

Why is national inflation not the simple average of six cities?

The national index combines city data using weights corresponding to regional expenditure. Cities do not all receive equal weight.

Does cheaper education benefit every household?

Relief depends on whether a household buys the particular service and whether its actual bill changed. The aggregate index does not measure each family’s savings.

What is the city comparison useful for?

It shows the spread of price growth and differences between expenses. Household budgeting or company pricing also requires an assessment of actual incomes and costs.